Obi Slams ADC Judgement, Says APC Engineered Atiku Sacking
Last update: November 6, 2026
Disclaimer: This website may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. We only recommend products or services that we personally use and believe will add value to our readers. Your support is appreciated!

Just months before the 2027 presidential election, the opposition has been thrown into fresh chaos — and Peter Obi is not having it.
The former Anambra governor and Labour Party presidential candidate says the Federal High Court order sacking the entire David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and voiding Atiku Abubakar’s nomination stinks of political engineering.
And in his words, the fingerprints point straight to the ruling APC.
In a judgment that has sent shockwaves through opposition circles, Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday, November 5, 2026, nullified the leadership of the African Democratic Congress led by former Senate President David Mark.
The court declared the Mark-led caretaker committee illegal, ruling in favour of Nafiu Bala Gombe, a former National Deputy Chairman (North-East) of the party. The judge held that the emergence of the Mark-led leadership following the resignation of former National Chairman Ralph Nwosu violated the party’s constitution, the Electoral Act and the 1999 Constitution.
Crucially, the court also invalidated all decisions taken by the caretaker committee, including the nomination of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar as the ADC presidential candidate for the 2027 general elections.
Atiku has already vowed to challenge the judgment at the Court of Appeal.
Peter Obi’s Take: "Do Not Undermine Democracy"
Writing on his verified X handle, Obi said he received the news "with shock", calling it "unsettling and surprising."
"I do not challenge the ruling of the court. The court of law is constituted to determine disputes according to the law. My concern is that three months before a general election, it is in the public interest to have certainty."
Here is the full statement, as shared with cbinewstv.com:
"Judgement Sacking ADC Leadership, Atiku Engineered By APC - Do Not Undermine Democracy. I have received with shock the news of an order by the Federal High Court in Abuja nullifying the emergence of the Chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and all the actions he has taken. This is unsettling and surprising... This instability is obviously engineered by the ruling party, just as they have done against me in the Labour Party and continue to do so to close down civic space for a robust campaign. It is also from the same rulebook that manufactures violence against us in our campaigns. One mark of democracy is that at all times, it is voters and not courts that choose leaders... A new Nigeria is POssible. -PO"
If this feels like déjà vu, that’s because it is.
1. The ADC as the new opposition coalition: After years in political wilderness — the ADC was founded in 2005 and polled just 0.34% in the 2019 presidential election — the party became the beautiful bride in 2025-2026. Top opposition figures, including Atiku Abubakar, David Mark, and Rauf Aregbesola, adopted it as the vehicle for a grand coalition to challenge the APC in 2027.
2. The Labour Party playbook: Obi knows this script too well. Since the 2023 election,s where he pulled over 6.1 million votes to finish third, the Labour Party has been dogged by endless court battles over its leadership — from Julius Abure to the Lamidi Apapa faction. Obi has consistently alleged that these crises are externally sponsored to weaken the opposition.
3. The historical pattern: Nigeria has a long history of pre-election judicial sacking. Remember 2022-2023? Courts sacked candidates in Zamfara, Bayelsa and Imo weeks before elections. The Supreme Court itself has warned about courts deciding elections instead of voters. Obi’s line — "voters and not courts that choose leaders" — taps directly into that frustration.
Forget the legal jargon for a minute. What does this mean for the average Nigerian?
Imagine you are a trader in Onitsha Main Market, a student in UNILAG, or a farmer in Benue who has already started debating ADC vs APC vs LP at your local joint. Three months to the election, you don’t even know who is legally allowed to be on the ballot.
That uncertainty is exhausting. It kills voter enthusiasm, confuses INEC logistics, and makes people feel like their vote doesn’t matter because a judge in Abuja will decide anyway. That’s the democratic cost Obi is shouting about.
With military coups returning in West Africa — Mali (2020, 2021), Burkina Faso (2022), Niger (2023), Guinea (2021) — Nigeria remains one of the region’s few stable democracies.
Obi’s argument is that stamping out opposition parties, whether through court orders or engineered internal crises, weakens that stability. A democracy without a thriving, stable opposition is just a one-party state in disguise.
And with over 93 million registered voters in 2023, and youth turnout expected to be even higher in 2027, public trust in the process is everything.
What Does the Judgment Actually Do?
In simple terms:
* What was nullified? The entire David Mark caretaker NWC that took over after Ralph Nwosu resigned.
* Why? The plaintiff, Nafiu Bala Gombe, argued that the process that brought Mark and Aregbesola in broke the party’s own constitution.
* Consequence? Every action that NWC took is now void — including Atiku’s presidential ticket.
* Is it final? No. Atiku has pointed to an earlier Federal High Court judgment by Justice Musa Liman on July 2, 2026, which dismissed a similar challenge. The case will almost certainly go to the Court of Appeal and possibly the Supreme Court.
What Next?
1. Appeal: Expect the ADC coalition to file an urgent appeal and seek a stay of execution. Atiku’s team already says they will.
2. INEC Watch: The Independent National Electoral Commission was listed as a defendant. INEC will now have to decide whose name to publish, which creates more legal drama.
3. Opposition Unity Test: Will Obi, Atiku and the coalition stay together under pressure, or will this crack widen? Obi’s statement is a clear olive branch — defending Atiku even though they may be rivals.
4. The Courts: Nigerians will be watching to see if the judiciary can give certainty quickly, rather than leaving the ballot in limbo until February.
As Obi put it, this is a time to strengthen democracy by allowing the opposition to thrive. Whether the courts and the ruling party agree is another matter entirely.
Credit: This analysis is based on a statement shared with cbinewstv.com. Court details verified from reports of the Federal High Court judgment of Nov 5, 2026.
#PeterObi #AtikuAbubakar #ADC #DavidMark #NigeriaDecides2027 #NigerianPolitics #Democracy #CourtJudgement #APC #LabourParty #cbinewstv


